Google credentials stop working after a while

Questions
7

@Jon Welp I tried to add them but n8n doesn’t allow it.

this is a list of everything I was NOT able to add to the data field in the POST request:

"data": {
      "grantType": "authorizationCode",
      "authUrl": "https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/v2/auth",
      "accessTokenUrl": "https://oauth2.googleapis.com/token",
      "scope": "https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive.appdata https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive.photos.readonly",
      "authQueryParameters": "access_type=offline&prompt=consent",
      "authentication": "body"
    }

The response message was always:

{
  "message": "request.body.data is not allowed to have the additional property \"authQueryParameters\""
}

for the above fields it was the same error but with the appropriate field name used.

Here is a sample of the body of my POST request that failed with the above error from n8n:

{
  "name": "Test-account-000",
  "type": "googleDriveOAuth2Api",
  "data": {
    "clientId": "xxx",
    "clientSecret": "xxx",
    "oauthTokenData": {
      "access_token": "xxx",
      "token_type": "Bearer",
      "refresh_token": "xxx",
      "callbackQueryString": {
        "scope": "openid https://www.googleapis.com/auth/drive.readonly https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.email https://www.googleapis.com/auth/userinfo.profile"
      },
      "expires_in": 3599
    },
    "authQueryParameters": "access_type=offline&prompt=consent"
  }
}

I of course tried all the fields mentioned and all of them failed. Tried them 1 by 1.
And @jan (sorry if being a nuisance) mentioned this: Can n8n be used to authenticate with multiple different users? - #15 by jan

So if the fields in data are being applied automatically, is it a bug that they are not in the data, such as authQueryParameters param, when I export a credential?

Could it be the bug preventing token refreshing?

PS: the google drive credential added by n8n credential tab UI is still working as expected, while the one added programmatically by me is still, as expected, failing