Sharing another portfolio build — this one tackles a problem every service business knows: inquiries arrive, someone has to read each one, copy details into a tracker, judge the budget and timing, check if they’ve contacted you before, and reply. When that depends on inbox habits, follow-up gets inconsistent.
What the workflow does (11 nodes)
- A structured n8n form captures the inquiry: contact info, project details, service needed, budget range, timeline.
- Each inquiry gets a transparent score out of 100 — service fit (40 pts), budget (40 pts), timeline (20 pts).
- Priority is assigned by rule: 80+ = High, 60–79 = Medium, below 60 = Low. Requests for services outside the list go to Manual Review instead of being auto-scored.
- The workflow checks the tracker for the normalized email address. Returning contacts are flagged (without overwriting their earlier inquiries), so the team sees the full history.
- Every inquiry is recorded in Google Sheets (17 mapped fields). The submitter gets a confirmation email.
- Only High priority and Manual Review inquiries trigger an internal sales alert — with contact details, score, priority, and returning-contact status.
Why I built it this way
- The scoring is deliberately transparent and adjustable — a real agency should set the weights against its own sales process, not mine.
- Low/Medium inquiries stay visible in the tracker; they just don’t page the sales team.
- Returning-contact detection uses email matching, which is a practical heuristic, not identity verification.
Honest scope
Tested portfolio demonstration with sample inquiries and controlled accounts — seven scenario types including returning contacts and blocked invalid emails. Not a live client deployment; no conversion or time-saving claims. The demo rules are illustrative, not an industry standard.
Full case study: Inbound Lead Qualification & Sales Alerts | Farzam Saadat
More of my n8n work: https://syedfarzamsaadat.com
If you’ve built lead scoring in n8n, I’d be curious how you weighted things — always interesting to compare approaches.

