Looking for 1 more real workflow case from another n8n team

Help me Build my Workflow
, ,
1

I’ve now tested 2 anonymized workflow cases locally:

  • voucher validation
  • invoice extraction / strict schema validation

Both were useful.

Now I’m looking for 1 more real case, ideally from a different workflow or team, to see whether this kind of boundary is useful beyond those first examples.

What I’m testing is very narrow:
should the workflow continue downstream, or should it stop safely here?

Good examples would be things like:

  • classification / routing
  • compliance / policy checks
  • document extraction
  • anything where bad structured output creates real downstream cost

What I need:

  • 1 sample payload
  • 1 target schema
  • 1 short note on what breaks downstream if it passes incorrectly
  • polling or webhook preference

What I can return:

  • whether the run ended in succeeded or failed_safe
  • a short reason if relevant
  • a receipt reference

This is not broad onboarding and not a product pitch.
I just want one more real case from another workflow/team.

Public kit:

If sharing the full payload is hard, a short outline first is fine.
Reply here or DM me.

2

Un caso útil es la extracción de facturas antes del enrutamiento a ERP/AP.

Ejemplo de carga útil entrante:

{
  "file_url": "https://example.com/invoice_4821.pdf",
  "vendor_hint": "ABC Supplies",
  "received_at": "2026-06-01T10:15:00Z"
}

Esquema objetivo:

{
  "vendor_name": "string",
  "tax_id": "string|null",
  "document_date": "YYYY-MM-DD",
  "currency": "ISO_4217",
  "line_items": [
    {
      "item_description": "string",
      "quantity": "number",
      "unit_price": "number",
      "total_price": "number"
    }
  ],
  "subtotal": "number",
  "tax_amount": "number",
  "total_amount": "number"
}

Riesgo posterior si es incorrecto:

  • proveedor incorrecto enruta la factura al flujo de trabajo de AP incorrecto

  • moneda total o cantidad incorrectas crean datos de aprobación/pago deficientes

  • líneas de artículos faltantes interrumpen la reconciliación

  • subtotal + impuesto que no coincide con el total significa que el flujo de trabajo debe detenerse, no continuar

Para este tipo de caso, querría que el límite devuelva:

completed

o:

failed_safe

con una razón como:

schema_invalid
totals_mismatch
missing_required_field
low_confidence_vendor

El sondeo es aceptable para este tipo de flujo de trabajo porque la extracción de facturas generalmente no es crítica en términos de latencia. La parte importante es que el paso posterior de ERP/AP solo se ejecute después de que pasen las verificaciones de esquema y matemáticas.

1 me gusta