Hi @mriioos, welcome!
I’m listening ![]()
I just saw you mention this topic in another category, so I’ll reply here.
Yes, I’m able to reproduce this,
but IMO this is an incorrect design, especially when working with loop nodes:
You’ve already closed the first loop, so you should link the next node to the done branch, like this:
IMO when working with loops, you need to be fully aware of how they work and how they behave, and design your workflow accordingly..

