That’s the point, that’s your issue… The webhook node doesn’t output any email or name fields at all. According to the last image you provided(JSON of the webhook output) there is only message field under query parameter. That’s why this field works fine, while others return undefined.
Considering that you used Claude to generate the workflow, Calude may have hallucinated that the webhook will return those fields(AI hallucinates a lot when it comes to workflow building). At this point nothing you change in your workflow will solve your issue. Basically, if the workflow doesn’t receive those fields, then you can’t reference them using expressions.
Oh so it’s not possible to build this workflow and collect name, email from my chatbot front end (ther is a first page which collects these fields and then moves to the second page which is teh chatbot). So is n8n not the right workflow tool for this?
The Chatbot is saying that when I test it out.
If your first page (a form, I presume?) collects an email address, then you can either send it to the workflow or the workflow can get it after the fact. n8n and your AI can definitely use email addresses, so I think it is your (Claude’s) design that is at issue here, not n8n.
If you can share what you are doing with the app and explain more about the apps and services you are using, that would be helpful.
Instead spending days with something that you don’t understand… isn’t better to follow the n8n official course for 2-3 hours, and you will grasp the essentials…
Yes, first page is a form, collecting email address / name. Otherwise all my documents are in github, all written by Claude. They have worked perfectly up until this integration point. Here is what’s in github . Then the chatbot is deployed on Vercel. That’s it
Yes I could! Will it tell me how to integrate with Vercel to deploy chat bot and collect it’s data (i.e. answer this particular question?!). My use case at the moment is very limited so I’d prefer to spend time on this particular issue.
Ok then, have fun keeping to change the title of the topic for each issue you encounter on a hallucinating model instructions, then hope that someone will magically make clear your “particular” project.
Have fun !
Bye
While you’re not wrong that it is convenient for people to do training before using forums, this was a really poor early customer experience - to be patronised when asking for support - so I’ve turned to another product. I have done n8n training Parintele, just not n8n’s own training.
Appreciate the responses from others on this thread!
Hi, I would like to help you, but I think you need to do one of two things:
- Clearly articulate what you are trying to accomplish and how you are doing it, along with some sample data or a quick Loom video
- Take a step back and learn more about the product before continuing.
At the end of the day, you need to be more open and share what you are doing. Broken screenshots and pictures of files aren’t helpful.
