Secure n8n AI Translator (v2.1): A Zero-Trust Architecture for Sensitive Data

Hey n8n community! :waving_hand:

Following up on my first tutorial :backhand_index_pointing_right: Beginner Tutorial: Build an AI Translator Chrome Extension with n8n I’m taking things to the next level with a focus on Privacy-First Engineering.

We all know the standard way to build a translation extension: capture text, send it to a webhook with an API key, and hope for the best. But when handling legal documents, proprietary code, or sensitive research, “hoping” isn’t a security strategy.

I’m sharing my Software Requirements Specification (SRS) and Technical Design Document (TDD) early because I want your feedback on the security model before I move into the final build phase.

*************************

SRS: Secure n8n AI Translator

1. Executive Summary

Project Name: Secure n8n AI Translator

Objective: To build a Chrome Extension that allows users to highlight any text on the web and translate it using a private, self-hosted n8n AI backend.


2. Business Logic and User Story

The Product: A privacy-first translation tool for professionals who work with sensitive data and want to use their own AI models (via n8n) rather than third-party cloud services.

The User Workflow:

  1. Capture: User highlights text on a webpage.

  2. Interaction: User opens the extension popup; the highlighted text is already there.

  3. Selection: User selects a target language (e.g., Arabic, Spanish, French).

  4. Execution: User clicks “Translate.”

  5. Security: The app signs the request with a secret key (never sent) and pings the n8n webhook.

  6. Review: The translation appears in the result area.

  7. Persistence: The original and translated text are saved to a “Local History” list for future reference.


3. System Architecture

The developer is building a three tier system:

  1. Frontend (UI): popup.html for translation and options.html for configuration.

  2. Middleware (Logic): A Background Service Worker (background.js) handling cryptography and browser storage.

  3. Backend (Automation): An n8n workflow that validates the signature and talks to an LLM (like GPT-4 or Claude).


4. Functional Requirements (What the Developer must code)

4.1 The Translation Engine

  • Automatic Capture: On popup open, the app must execute a content script to grab window.getSelection() from the active tab.

  • Multi-Language Support: The UI must provide a dropdown of target languages which are sent as part of the JSON payload to n8n.

  • Asynchronous Processing: The UI must show a “Thinking…” state while waiting for the n8n webhook to respond.

4.2 The “Handshake” Security (HMAC)

  • Shared Secret: The developer must implement a field in the options page for a “Secret Key.”

  • Signing Logic: Before every fetch(), the app must use the Web Crypto API to create a SHA-256 HMAC signature.

  • Signature Ingredients: Payload (Text + Language) + Nonce (Timestamp) + Secret Key.

  • Verification: The developer must configure the n8n backend to re-calculate this hash. If they don’t match, the translation is denied.

4.3 History and Local Storage

  • Persistent Logging: Every successful translation must be saved as an object in chrome.storage.local.

  • History Structure: ```json

{

  "id": "unique-id",

  "timestamp": "iso-date",

  "originalText": "The source text...",

  "translatedText": "The result...",

  "targetLanguage": "Arabic"

}
  • History UI: The bottom of the popup must render a list of these items. Clicking an item must “Restore” that translation into the main view areas.

5. Technical Specifications

5.1 Extension Frontend

  • options.html: Must feature UI Masking. When a saved secret key is retrieved, it should be displayed as •••••••••••• to the user, but the full string must remain available in the background for signing.

  • popup.html: Must be responsive and handle long text strings by providing scrollable textareas.

5.2 Storage Strategy

  • chrome.storage.local: For the Webhook URL, the Secret Key, and the Translation History.

  • chrome.storage.session: For the temporary “Nonce” (timestamp) used during the HMAC handshake to prevent replay attacks within a single browser session.

5.3 n8n Backend Requirements

  • Webhook Node: Set to POST.

  • Crypto Node: To execute the HmacSHA256 verification.

  • AI Agent Node: Configured with a system prompt: “You are a professional translator. Translate the input text precisely into the requested language. Maintain the original tone.”


6. Non-Functional Requirements

  • Privacy: No data is allowed to be sent to any server other than the user-configured n8n URL.

  • Security: The “Shared Secret” must never appear in the network logs (DevTools).

  • Speed: The history list must load in under 100ms.



1. System Architecture Diagram (Logical)

Hi @Benjamin_Behrens

I’m pushing the boundaries of what we usually see in n8n-integrated browser extensions. I’ve just published the design docs for a Secure AI Translator that uses a local Native Messaging Host to handle cryptographic signing—keeping the secret key completely out of the extension’s storage.

I’m sharing these early to get community feedback on the “Zero-Trust” handshake logic before I release the second tutorial. I’d love to get your thoughts on the verification flow if you have a moment!

Really solid approach with the Zero-Trust handshake — keeping the secret out of extension storage via Native Messaging Host is smart. The HMAC-SHA256 verification + nonce for replay attack prevention are exactly what sensitive data flows need. One thing: make sure the n8n backend validates the timestamp within a tight window (like 60s) to catch stale requests. Looking forward to seeing the second part!

2 Likes

@Benjamin_Behrens
Thanks so much for the review! I’m really glad the Native Messaging - Zero-Trust approach resonates.

You are spot on about the timestamp window. I had originally debated between 5 minutes and 60 seconds, but tightening that drift window to strictly 60s is definitely the right move to kill stale requests early. I’m going to make sure that specific Code Node validation step is front-and-center in Part 2.

Really appreciate you taking the time to look it over.