Hi all, I am struggling with webhooks not executing when I execute the whole workflow from the beginning. For some context I am using RocketReach as a web service as a sort of scraper which has been working quite well but when I go to execute the workflow the webhooks don’t activate to where they are actively waiting for the input from the web service. Does anyone have any thoughts on how I achieve it so that when I execute the complete workflow the webhooks all start “waiting” for the data? Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
1 Like
Hey @N8NBuilder !
If you activate the workflow (top-right the toggle button) , all the triggers will ‘listen’ in background (assuming each trigger has different path).For each incoming request, only the matching trigger will fire and start that execution…
Can you share an image with your workflow as a “bigger picture” so we can understand the purpose?
Cheers!
1 Like
Hey @N8NBuilder … trying to understand why you put all triggers in same workflow.
And you are trying to merge some data, but in the workflow all requests will be handled one by one…
Can you explain what you try to achieve, maybe ther s a simple solution.
Cheers!
I’m trying to pull email addresses and company contact data from rocket reaches application using their API key access to then input it into a google sheets when the workflow is executed. The reason I was using five webhooks is because Rocket Reach limits me to only 100 data points per search, when I want 500 total data points per search. Do you think I am better to simply create a loop and have the loop run 5 times or do you have another suggestion? Thank you for your efforts and suggestions @Parintele_Damaskin
Now that I took a look at their API docs:
That would be logic , but again depends on why you have 5 and the logic there … if you loop , responses will hit your webhook and procces. Don’t get the Merge node what it does…
Without more context I can’t clearly say that you can do it “better”…
I will give that a try, thanks for the advice! I think by adjusting it to work with the loop node, the merge node becomes unnecessary. Thanks for all your help! @Parintele_Damaskin