[AI Agent] Multi-Agent Architecture Review: n8n Workflow for Persona-Based Content

Hey n8n community! :slightly_smiling_face: I’m looking for some feedback/advice on an Agent AI project I’m currently building.

:bullseye: Project Goal:
An AI Agent designed to generate highly personalized LinkedIn posts for store directors (e.g., Carrefour).
The content is based on:

  1. Upcoming Commercial Events (from a Google Sheet).
  2. The unique Persona/Editorial Style of each Director (critical for authenticity).

:gear: My Workflow Logic (Sub-Workflow):
The process runs through a sequential chain of “small agents”:

  1. AI Planificateur: Looks at the event calendar and decides the next post/director to target.
  2. AI Rédacteur: Writes the post, strictly following the director’s persona profile.
  3. AI Validation: Scores the post on compliance, style, and fidelity (scores are written to an ‘Evaluation’ sheet).
  4. AI Superviseur (Main WF): Reads the validation score and decides if an email (for manual approval) is sent to the director.

:red_question_mark: My Questions to the Community:

  1. Coherence: Does this architecture (:one: Supervisor WF calling a :two: Sub-Workflow of sequential agents) seem coherent and robust for this type of task?
  2. Simplification: If you had to simplify this setup, where would you start? Could the Plan, Write, and Validate steps be consolidated into a single, more powerful Agent without losing quality control?

Any feedback on the structure or the concept is highly appreciated! Does it work on? I don’t how to use the aggregate or function modules :frowning:

1 Like