Hey all! @jan @netroy
As previous topic is closed, I’m opening this one.
Really great to hear that hashing an image should be possible now, unfortunately I still get different results when manually hashing an image.
See bellow workflow:
Hashing the file through SHA256 File Checksum Online gives me a different result:
Any thoughts on what is going on here?
Thanks so much!
I have just given it a test and it is working for me, It looks like the issue in your workflow is you are not using Binary Data and are instead generating a hash for a string. Try setting the node to look like this…
This output can then be verified manually from the tool you have found or from a terminal…
There is also no need to tag folk as we get notifications on new posts and I know I find being tagged can often be a distraction from what I am currently working on
Right - apologies, I had no idea tagging is that intrusive.
Thank you for the solution, I was just following the same workflow setup that Jan provided me in the other topic.
… and now I see what is wrong. I’ve pulled the latest version from github, but that’s 231.3 , the binary data option is in 232.0 (pre-release). I’m a complete noob with github, so I guess it is not yet in my version (stable release I presume).
My bad, sorry!
I was using
0.233.0 which should be available as the
next label although I would have to check the release notes to see when it was added.
This topic was automatically closed 7 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.