[For Hire] I build the n8n workflows that replace the copy-paste part of someone's job

Most automation requests I get aren’t really “build me a workflow.” They’re “someone on my team spends two hours a day moving data between two tools, and I want that to stop.”

That’s what I build in n8n.

What I actually ship

  • Lead intake & qualification — form / Telegram / email → validation → CRM or Sheets → a notification to the right person. With an AI step that reads and tags the message when it earns its place.
    • Scheduled reporting — pull an API on a schedule, diff against the last snapshot, summarise with an LLM, deliver to chat or email. (Recent build: SEO rank tracking → position diff → GPT summary → Telegram, with a per-client schedule.)
    • Data sync between tools — two systems that don’t talk to each other, kept in sync with conflict handling, not a one-way dump.
    • AI agents that hold state — booking and consultation bots that keep the conversation in a Data Table, not in the prompt.
      How I work

Fixed price by default, 50% to start and 50% on acceptance. Everything runs on your n8n — self-hosted or your cloud — so you keep the workflows if we stop working together. Every build ships with a handover doc that says what each node does and how to add a new client or data source. 14–30 days of fixes included, depending on the package.

Rates

Scope Price
One production workflow — error handling, walkthrough, 14 days of fixes $350
3–5 connected workflows — shared error handling, handover doc, 30 days of fixes $900
6–15 workflows or an AI agent with memory — architecture doc, staging + prod, monitoring from $2,200
Care plan — monitoring, fixes, small changes, cancel anytime $400/mo

If the scope isn’t clear yet: $45/h with a capped 2-hour discovery block, then we fix the price before anyone commits. Discovery happens in writing — you send me the current process, I send back a flow sketch and the questions that matter.

How I communicate

I work in writing, not on calls — I use a translator, so text is where I’m precise. You get recorded walkthroughs instead of meetings. In practice that works in your favour: decisions, scope and handover all end up written down and searchable, instead of said once on a call and remembered differently by two people.

Proof, since I’m new to this board

A booking agent I built recently: Telegram → n8n → Data Table, state moving waiting_date → waiting_phone → completed, card to the team at the end. No Google Sheets, no external database — the state lives in n8n. I have a 20-second recording of it running end to end; this account is too new to attach files, so DM me and I’ll send it over.

Two things I’ve learned the hard way and will happily walk you through before you hire anyone: a per-client schedule belongs in a next_report_date field plus a Filter, not in one trigger per client; and a retry without an idempotency key will quietly duplicate rows in your CRM.

Invoicing and contract go through an EU entity, so a normal bank transfer works — no crypto, no odd payment rails.

Happy to sketch the flow for your case before any money changes hands. Reply here or DM me.

Your scheduled reporting line, diff against the last snapshot, is the part most people skip.

I learned why it matters the hard way. 27 branches in my own engine were skipped every day while every run finished COMPLETED, and with no previous snapshot to compare against there was nothing that could have told me.

The limit I have not solved is the first run. A new workflow has no snapshot, and that is exactly when the condition is most likely to be wrong.

What is the most common thing you find when a client’s report suddenly changes shape?