Hi @Exnav29 , I really like this article, and I think the title is accurate for what it covers: simple test cases.
I also like the “The Six Types of Tests Worth Running” section for n8n workflows, because it helps generate test cases in a very practical way.
I would just add one boundary view: for a real n8n workflow, especially when the system grows beyond a simple automation, a test case is usually part of a wider structure. In larger systems, I like to think of it as:
- test plan
- test cycle
- test case
- category such as security, functionality, or performance
- module or workflow area
- priority
- bug report and status
So for a simple workflow, this is a very good starting point. For larger automation systems with frontend, backend, database, and multiple workflows, the testing model becomes more layered.
I like the way you presented it, and I think this is a strong base to build on.