Hi team,
I’d like to provide some feedback on the Assistant
based on how I’ve been using it within my workflows (flowgramming
).
I rely heavily on the Assistant to help me understand how to use n8n nodes effectively. Typically, I describe the outcome I want, and the Assistant guides me through building the flow using available nodes.
However, I’ve noticed that sometimes the suggestions don’t match the actual configuration options in the nodes. For instance, in the case of the Merge node, the Assistant recommended using modes such as Pass-through
or Combine by position
, which are not currently available in the UI.
Here’s a screenshot showing the discrepancy:
As shown:
- The available modes for the Merge node are:
Append
,Combine
,SQL Query
, andChoose Branch
. - Within the
Combine
mode, there’s aCombine By
setting, where options likeMatching Fields
,Position
, andAll Possible Combinations
are listed.
It appears that the Assistant is confusing Mode
with Combine By
, resulting in misleading instructions.
Would it be possible to add a validation layer in the AI’s logic to:
- Cross-check the current node schema and configuration options before generating a response?
- Or possibly fetch the current state of the node options dynamically to ensure up-to-date accuracy?