Does "adding wait node" after post http request make sense in a subflow?

Describe the issue/error/question

This is my main flow to iterate through / loop through all the mails in batch;

This is my subflow;

  • Does “adding wait node” after post http request make sense in the subflow?


Information on your n8n setup

  • n8n version:last version of n8n cloud

Hi @onurbolaca, it can make sense. The execution of your parent workflow would only continue once the last node of your sub-workflow has been executed, so if you want to add an intentional waiting time this could be useful.

It does however take away a bit of visibility as the parent wouldn’t see which node exactly is currently running in the sub-workflow. So unless there are any memory limits at play here I’d try adding the wait to the loop in your parent workflow instead.

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.