I’ve now tested 2 anonymized workflow cases locally:
voucher validation
invoice extraction / strict schema validation
Both were useful.
Now I’m looking for 1 more real case, ideally from a different workflow or team, to see whether this kind of boundary is useful beyond those first examples.
What I’m testing is very narrow:
should the workflow continue downstream, or should it stop safely here?
Good examples would be things like:
classification / routing
compliance / policy checks
document extraction
anything where bad structured output creates real downstream cost
What I need:
1 sample payload
1 target schema
1 short note on what breaks downstream if it passes incorrectly
polling or webhook preference
What I can return:
whether the run ended in succeeded or failed_safe
a short reason if relevant
a receipt reference
This is not broad onboarding and not a product pitch.
I just want one more real case from another workflow/team.
Public kit:
If sharing the full payload is hard, a short outline first is fine.
Reply here or DM me.
Polling is fine for this type of workflow because invoice extraction is not usually latency-critical. The important part is that the downstream ERP/AP step only runs after the schema and math checks pass.